ERP Development
Operational backbones that fit your business, not a template industry.
Manufacturing · 2024
Placeholder content. These engagement details illustrate structure and formatting. They are not reported client results and will be replaced with verified client stories before this site goes live.
Results
The challenge
The manufacturer ran on an ERP implemented nineteen years earlier and customized heavily since. It held accurate financial data but had no usable interface for the shop floor, so production tracking happened on paper travelers keyed in at week's end.
The consequence was costing that lagged reality by weeks. During a period of volatile material pricing the company was quoting from standard costs set months earlier, and analysis later showed several product lines had been sold below cost for an extended period.
Two previous replacement attempts had failed. One was abandoned after eighteen months and a substantial write-off, which had understandably made leadership wary of another large program.
Our approach
Our assessment concluded the ERP was fit for finance and unfit for operations. Replacing all of it to fix half of it carried risk the business had already demonstrated it could not absorb.
A documented service layer over the ERP gave us a stable interface to build against and isolated everything downstream from the legacy system's structure.
Ruggedized scanning terminals replaced paper travelers for job start, completion and material issue. Designed for gloves and under five seconds per scan, they reached full adoption in three weeks.
With actual labor and material consumption flowing in continuously, costing moved from month-old standards to current actuals, and quoting was rebuilt on top of it.
Each module went live and stabilized before the next began. Nothing was attempted in parallel, which is why nothing failed.
The outcome
The margin improvement came primarily from identifying and repricing work that had been quoted below cost — a problem the business knew existed but could not locate without accurate current costing.
The ERP remains in place. Leadership now describes the modernization as a series of small, individually reversible changes, which is what made it possible to proceed after two failed replacement attempts.
“The previous attempts failed because they asked us to bet the company on a single cutover. This one never did.”
Keep exploring
Operational backbones that fit your business, not a template industry.
Systems that satisfy security, compliance and a thousand users.
Pipelines that deliver correct data on time, every time.
One version of the numbers, available when decisions get made.
More work
A national third-party logistics provider was losing bids over visibility capability and burning customer service capacity on status requests. We built a shipment tracking platform on top of their existing TMS.
A specialty medical group operating fourteen locations was losing clinical capacity to paper intake and manual insurance verification. We built a HIPAA-compliant digital intake system integrated with their EHR.
Next step
Bring us the version of it you are dealing with. The first conversation costs nothing and usually clarifies more than a proposal would.
No pitch deck. A 30-minute conversation about what you are trying to achieve.