Skip to content

Manufacturing · 2024

Modernizing a 19-year-old ERP without replacing it

A precision components manufacturer was quoting from costs that were months out of date. Rather than a replacement program, we modernized incrementally around the existing system.
Client
Precision components manufacturer
Duration
14 months
Services
4 practices involved

Placeholder content. These engagement details illustrate structure and formatting. They are not reported client results and will be replaced with verified client stories before this site goes live.

Results

Inventory accuracy, up from 82%
97.8%Inventory accuracy, up from 82%
Job costing, previously four to six weeks
Same dayJob costing, previously four to six weeks
Gross margin after quote model correction
+6.4 ptsGross margin after quote model correction
Unplanned production stoppages during rollout
0Unplanned production stoppages during rollout

The challenge

What was actually going wrong

The manufacturer ran on an ERP implemented nineteen years earlier and customized heavily since. It held accurate financial data but had no usable interface for the shop floor, so production tracking happened on paper travelers keyed in at week's end.

The consequence was costing that lagged reality by weeks. During a period of volatile material pricing the company was quoting from standard costs set months earlier, and analysis later showed several product lines had been sold below cost for an extended period.

Two previous replacement attempts had failed. One was abandoned after eighteen months and a substantial write-off, which had understandably made leadership wary of another large program.

Our approach

How we worked the problem

  1. 01

    Rule out replacement honestly

    Our assessment concluded the ERP was fit for finance and unfit for operations. Replacing all of it to fix half of it carried risk the business had already demonstrated it could not absorb.

  2. 02

    Build an integration layer first

    A documented service layer over the ERP gave us a stable interface to build against and isolated everything downstream from the legacy system's structure.

  3. 03

    Start with shop floor capture

    Ruggedized scanning terminals replaced paper travelers for job start, completion and material issue. Designed for gloves and under five seconds per scan, they reached full adoption in three weeks.

  4. 04

    Rebuild costing on real data

    With actual labor and material consumption flowing in continuously, costing moved from month-old standards to current actuals, and quoting was rebuilt on top of it.

  5. 05

    Then scheduling, then analytics

    Each module went live and stabilized before the next began. Nothing was attempted in parallel, which is why nothing failed.

The outcome

What changed afterward

The margin improvement came primarily from identifying and repricing work that had been quoted below cost — a problem the business knew existed but could not locate without accurate current costing.

The ERP remains in place. Leadership now describes the modernization as a series of small, individually reversible changes, which is what made it possible to proceed after two failed replacement attempts.

The previous attempts failed because they asked us to bet the company on a single cutover. This one never did.
Chief Operating OfficerPrecision components manufacturer

Keep exploring

Services used in this engagement

ERP Development

Operational backbones that fit your business, not a template industry.

More work

Other engagements

Logistics & Transportation20256 months

Replacing 400 status calls a day with a customer visibility portal

A national third-party logistics provider was losing bids over visibility capability and burning customer service capacity on status requests. We built a shipment tracking platform on top of their existing TMS.

Inbound status calls within four months
-62%Inbound status calls within four months
Enterprise bids advanced past the visibility requirement
9 of 11Enterprise bids advanced past the visibility requirement
Healthcare20255 months

Cutting patient intake from 22 minutes to under 6

A specialty medical group operating fourteen locations was losing clinical capacity to paper intake and manual insurance verification. We built a HIPAA-compliant digital intake system integrated with their EHR.

Average intake processing time
22 → 5.8 minAverage intake processing time
Insurance-related claim denials
-71%Insurance-related claim denials

Next step

Have a problem shaped like this one?

Bring us the version of it you are dealing with. The first conversation costs nothing and usually clarifies more than a proposal would.

No pitch deck. A 30-minute conversation about what you are trying to achieve.

Back to all case studies