SEO Services
Compounding organic growth, measured in pipeline not rankings.
SaaS & Technology · 2025
Building an organic channel that outgrew paid in nine months
A vertical SaaS company was acquiring almost entirely through paid channels with a payback period their board had flagged. We built the organic and product-led motion alongside it.
- Client
- Series B vertical SaaS
- Duration
- 9 months
- Services
- 4 practices involved
Placeholder content. These engagement details illustrate structure and formatting. They are not reported client results and will be replaced with verified client stories before this site goes live.
Results
- Share of qualified pipeline from organic
- 5% → 34%Share of qualified pipeline from organic
- Blended customer acquisition cost
- -31%Blended customer acquisition cost
- Organic sessions with commercial intent
- 3.4×Organic sessions with commercial intent
- For organic to exceed paid in sourced pipeline
- 9 monthsFor organic to exceed paid in sourced pipeline
The challenge
What was actually going wrong
The company had grown to eight figures in ARR almost entirely through paid search and outbound. Blended acquisition cost had risen for six consecutive quarters as competitors bid up the same terms, and payback had extended past the point the board considered acceptable.
Organic contributed under 5% of pipeline. The blog published regularly on broad industry topics that attracted traffic with no purchase intent, while the comparison and evaluation queries their buyers actually searched were dominated by review sites and two competitors.
Attribution was unreliable enough that nobody could confidently say which channels produced revenue, which made every budget conversation an argument rather than a decision.
Our approach
How we worked the problem
- 01
Fix measurement first
We rebuilt tracking with server-side tagging and CRM integration so campaign, content and channel performance could be measured through to closed revenue rather than to form fill.
- 02
Start at the bottom of the funnel
Comparison, alternatives and pricing content was published first. It has the smallest volume and the highest intent, and it produced pipeline within the first quarter, which funded patience for the rest.
- 03
Build from sales conversations
We analyzed call recordings for the objections and questions that actually decided deals, then built content around them. That material also became sales enablement.
- 04
Clear the technical debt
The marketing site rendered client-side and was indexed inconsistently. Moving to server rendering with proper structure resolved a set of long-standing indexation problems.
- 05
Refresh rather than only publish
A structured refresh program on decaying pages recovered a substantial share of the total traffic gain at a fraction of the cost of new production.
The outcome
What changed afterward
Reducing dependence on paid acquisition was the strategic objective, and the shift in blended acquisition cost changed the company's efficiency profile ahead of their next raise.
The measurement work has had a durable secondary effect: budget allocation discussions are now settled with data rather than advocacy, which the leadership team cites as the more valuable outcome.
“The content nobody wanted to write — comparisons, pricing, honest limitations — turned out to be the content that produced pipeline.”
Keep exploring
Services used in this engagement
Content Marketing
Publishing that builds demand instead of filling a calendar.
Analytics
Measurement you can act on and defend.
Conversion Rate Optimization
Earning more from the traffic you already pay for.
More work
Other engagements
Logistics & Transportation20256 months
Replacing 400 status calls a day with a customer visibility portal
A national third-party logistics provider was losing bids over visibility capability and burning customer service capacity on status requests. We built a shipment tracking platform on top of their existing TMS.
- Inbound status calls within four months
- -62%Inbound status calls within four months
- Enterprise bids advanced past the visibility requirement
- 9 of 11Enterprise bids advanced past the visibility requirement
Healthcare20255 months
Cutting patient intake from 22 minutes to under 6
A specialty medical group operating fourteen locations was losing clinical capacity to paper intake and manual insurance verification. We built a HIPAA-compliant digital intake system integrated with their EHR.
- Average intake processing time
- 22 → 5.8 minAverage intake processing time
- Insurance-related claim denials
- -71%Insurance-related claim denials
Next step
Have a problem shaped like this one?
Bring us the version of it you are dealing with. The first conversation costs nothing and usually clarifies more than a proposal would.
No pitch deck. A 30-minute conversation about what you are trying to achieve.